SUS420J2 (AISI 420 / X30Cr13) — the stainless you can actually harden
How martensitic stainless SUS420J2 is hardened and tempered, why the tempering temperature decides corrosion resistance as well as hardness, and why zinc plating is usually the wrong finish for it.
Grade data
| JIS designation | SUS420J2 |
|---|---|
| Closest equivalents | AISI 420 / DIN X30Cr13 |
| Carbon (%) | 0.26–0.40 |
| Steel family | Stainless steel |
| Heat-treatment route | Quench and temper |
| Typical surface hardness (HRC) | 48–55 HRC |
| Typical hardness specified in service (HRC) | 45–52 HRC |
| Hardenable by heat treatment | Yes |
Hardness values are typical industry ranges for the small sections we process, and depend on the part, the section size, the quench and the governing specification. They are not a guarantee and do not replace your drawing or standard.
Reviewed:
What it is
SUS420J2 is a martensitic stainless steel — the family that hardens by heat treatment, unlike the austenitic grades. Roughly 13% chromium gives it corrosion resistance well below SUS304, and that resistance depends on the chromium staying in solution, which means it depends on how the part was heat treated and whether it was passivated afterwards.
How it is heat treated
Harden, then temper — and the tempering temperature is a materials decision, not just a hardness dial. Tempering low keeps hardness and corrosion resistance; tempering in the intermediate range costs both toughness and corrosion resistance through carbide precipitation; tempering high recovers toughness but gives away the hardness the grade was chosen for. Slow cooling after hardening does the same damage as a bad temper.
Plating and hydrogen embrittlement
Zinc plating a stainless part defeats the reason it was specified, and it is rarely the right answer here — passivation after machining and heat treatment is. Where an acid or electrolytic step is unavoidable, remember that martensitic stainless is genuinely susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement, unlike the austenitic grades, and the part is above the ISO 4042 hardness trigger.
Indicated after electroplating
ISO 4042 calls for embrittlement-relief baking on electroplated fasteners at property class 10.9 and above, or at roughly 390 HV (≈ 40 HRC) and above. Many customer specifications set a lower trigger — the drawing decides, not this page.
Hydrogen de-embrittlement bake plannerTypical ISO 898-1 property classes
When to choose it
Choose it when a part has to be both hardened and corrosion resistant — stainless screws and pins that need wear resistance, cutting or forming edges, and small parts in wet service.
When not to choose it
Do not choose it when you need SUS304-level corrosion resistance; 13% chromium in the hardened condition is a compromise and it will corrode in service that 304 shrugs off. Do not choose it for welded assemblies, and do not assume it can be tempered anywhere convenient on the temperature scale.
What tends to go wrong
Frequently asked questions
Is SUS420J2 as corrosion resistant as SUS304?+
No, and it is not close. It is a hardenable stainless bought for hardness with useful corrosion resistance, not for maximum corrosion resistance. Choosing between them is choosing which property you actually need.
Does martensitic stainless need de-embrittlement baking?+
If it has been through an acid or electrolytic process at hardened strength, treat it as susceptible — martensitic stainless is not immune the way austenitic 304 is, and at this hardness it is above the ISO 4042 trigger. The specification sets the requirement.